Learning in public without faking expertise
Learning in public is useful. Performing expertise you do not have is corrosive. The distinction matters more than it appears.
Read the noteGuidance library
Evergreen writing for readers making real decisions. Each note is short on purpose, readable in a few minutes, and written to stay useful for years.
The Journal holds the longer essays, for when you want the argument. This library holds short notes you can scan for a specific answer, for when you want the instruction. The writing discipline is the same in both.
Collection 01
How serious learning actually works. For readers who want to build competence in a new field over time, honestly.
Learning in public is useful. Performing expertise you do not have is corrosive. The distinction matters more than it appears.
Read the noteBecoming competent in a new field is not a single movement. It happens in stages, and trying to skip any of them is how people end up with false fluency.
Read the noteCollection 02
The operational half of the site. Explaining things simply, writing updates people can use, distributed-team habits, and the link between clarity and trust.
Simple explanations are harder to write than complicated ones. That is the part the field tends to get backwards.
Read the noteMost internal updates are written for the writer, not the reader. A useful update respects the reader's time by doing the sorting in advance.
Read the noteDistributed teams do not fail for lack of talent. They fail for lack of shared context, and shared context is built through habit.
Read the noteClarity is usually described as a style choice. It is better understood as a system.
Read the noteCollection 03
Short notes for humanitarian and development professionals in the middle of a move. Each one takes a skill you already have and shows how to name it, translate it, and carry it across.
Most humanitarians call themselves strong writers on their CV. That is not wrong. It is also not what the private sector is actually trying to buy.
Read the noteA humanitarian who has worked inside an emergency response knows what a system looks like when it is under stress. That knowledge is more transferable than it looks.
Read the noteIn the humanitarian sector, ethics is not a compliance module. It is a daily working condition. That is a professional capability, not a soft skill.
Read the noteFraming has a bad name in some quarters. That is not what a humanitarian communicator means by framing.
Read the noteThe most common mistake humanitarians make when applying for private-sector roles is submitting a CV written for the sector they are trying to leave.
Read the noteSuggested reading order
Four short routes through the library.
Start with Note 12, move to Note 11, then Note 13. Together they describe a working style that has held up across humanitarian coordination, research offices and product teams alike.
Read Notes 8 and 9. They are the spine of how I think about learning, in any field, including AI.
Read Note 10, then Note 14. The first is about making technical ideas plain; the second is about writing that people can act on.
Start with Note 18 for CV translation, then move through 14, 15, 16 and 17 in order. The five together give you the language to carry your skills across sectors without apologising for where they were built.
New notes are added when they are ready. If you want to hear about them, subscribe below.
You can unsubscribe any time. Your email will not be shared.
Thanks, you’re on the list. The first dispatch will arrive when the writing is worth your attention.
Something went wrong. Try again, or email me directly and I’ll add you by hand.